News
ALEP: Commonhold Reform Needs Candour as Well as Ambition
ALEP (the Association of Leasehold Enfranchisement Practitioners) has welcomed the House of Commons Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee’s report on the draft Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill but warned that the success of reform will depend on clear communication, practical detail and a realistic timetable for implementation.
The Committee’s report says the draft Bill would make a significant step towards replacing leasehold with commonhold and giving homeowners greater control over their buildings. ALEP agrees that the legislation represents an important opportunity to improve leaseholders’ experience of homeownership during this Parliament.
However, ALEP also supports the Committee’s concern that the Government’s pledge to ‘bring the feudal leasehold system to an end’ has left some leaseholders with mixed expectations about what the legislation will achieve and how quickly change will come.
If passed, the Bill will not end leasehold overnight. Many existing leaseholders may be unable to convert to commonhold in the short term; it may be several years before commonhold is mandated for new flats; existing flats will have to go through the leasehold enfranchisement process prior to conversion, and some forms of leasehold ownership, including shared ownership flats, are expected to continue as ‘permitted leases’.
Mark Chick, ALEP director and Senior Partner at Bishop & Sewell LLP said: ‘The Committee is right to welcome the draft Bill, but also right to call for greater realism. This is important legislation, but it is not a switch that will turn leasehold off the moment the Bill is passed.
“The changes certainly will not be quick. In practice, it may be several years before commonhold is mandated and, across parts of the market, it could be closer to a decade before commonhold is fully embedded and widely understood.
“Customer education and expectation management is vital to avoid consumers opting for commonhold on the basis that it is ‘easy’: leaseholders need to know what the Bill will do, what it will not do immediately and what further legislation or regulation may still be needed.
“Homeowners will need to understand not only the advantages of commonhold, but also the responsibilities that come with membership of a commonhold association, collective decision-making and long-term building management.”
The Committee has recommended that conversion to commonhold should become the default outcome of collective enfranchisement. ALEP says this could help simplify the route away from leasehold, but only if the Bill sets out how the cost of acquiring the freehold and converting to commonhold should be shared fairly between leaseholders who participate from the outset and those who do not.
This point was raised by Mark Chick in oral evidence to the Committee. He noted that although non-consenting leaseholders would have a right to buy out the commonhold of their unit at a later date, it is not yet clear how interests such as development value would be valued. Unless this is addressed, he warns, “Conversions could be discouraged if non-consenting leaseholders do not have to contribute anything towards the cost that the collective has endured to buy the freeholding in the first place”.
Mark Chick added: “We look forward to seeing the Government’s strategy and timetable for implementation. That needs to cover both the final Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill and the outstanding measures in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act.
“Leasehold reform now has strong political momentum. The task for Government is to turn that momentum into legislation that practitioners can apply, leaseholders can understand and the market can trust. The detail is not secondary to the policy – it is what determines whether the policy can be delivered.”
The Property Institute: King’s Speech Confirms Housing Reform Bills
Today, 13th May 2026, King Charles delivered the second King’s Speech of Sir Keir Starmer’s Labour Government, marking the State Opening of Parliament and setting out the Government’s legislative programme for the parliamentary session ahead.
The Speech confirms a major set of reforms in leasehold, housing and building safety, delivered through the following bills:
Leasehold and Commonhold Reform Bill
The Government has confirmed long-awaited legislation to reform the leasehold system and establish a new legal framework for commonhold. This comes following publication of the Draft Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill earlier this year and subsequent scrutiny by the Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee. The legislation is expected to:
- Introduce a new commonhold framework designed to make commonhold workable for a wider range of developments and support its transition to the default tenure for new flats;
- Ban the use of leasehold for new flats;
- Make it easier for existing leaseholders to convert their buildings to commonhold;
- Cap existing ground rents at £250 per year, reducing to a peppercorn after 40 years;
- Abolish forfeiture and replace it with a new leasehold enforcement regime intended to strengthen protections for leaseholders;
- Introduce further reforms to enfranchisement and estate management arrangements.
The Bill is likely to represent the most significant change to residential tenure in a generation.
Remediation Bill
The Government has also confirmed a Remediation Bill aimed at accelerating the remediation of unsafe cladding and strengthening enforcement against those responsible for delays. The legislation seeks to:
- Require construction product manufacturers to contribute towards remediation costs;
- Strengthen regulatory enforcement powers and sanctions for non-compliance;
- Introduce a new legal duty to remediate unsafe buildings;
- Mandate consistent external wall assessment standards and create a register of 11–18 metre buildings;
- Allow public bodies to step in where remediation has stalled;
- Close legal gaps to ensure residents have a route to remediation, including where ownership is unclear.
Social Housing Renewal Bill
Alongside this, the Government announced a Social Housing Renewal Bill designed to protect social housing stock, support investment in new affordable homes and strengthen tenant protections. The legislation intends to:
- Tighten Right to Buy eligibility and reduce discounts;
- Exempt newly built social homes from Right to Buy for 35 years;
- Strengthen protections for victims of domestic abuse;
- Streamline housing regulation and consents;
- Repeal unimplemented housing provisions from previous legislation.
Small Business Protections (Late Payments) Bill
The Government has also confirmed a Small Business Protections (Late Payments) Bill focused on tackling late payments and strengthening protections for SMEs. The legislation sets out to:
- Introduce maximum payment terms of 60 days;
- Enforce mandatory interest on late payments;
- Limit when invoice disputes can be raised;
- Require large companies to report on poor payment practices;
- Strengthen the powers of the Small Business Commissioner;
- Ban retention payment practices in parts of the construction sector.
Read the full King’s Speech briefing notes HERE.
What’s Next?
All bills will now proceed through Parliament over the coming months, with further detail expected once the Bills are formally published.
The Property Institute (TPI) will continue engaging closely with Government and stakeholders throughout the reform process and will keep members updated on key developments and implications for practice.
TPI Reacts
In response to the King’s Speech, Andrew Bulmer, Chief Executive of TPI, commented: On the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill “The Bill represents a once in a generation opportunity to change the way we own and manage flats in England and Wales. Commonhold and a reformed leasehold will bring greater self-governance to flat owners, who will enjoy new rights but also take on new legal responsibilities, including building safety, company administration and financial governance.
While we welcome the Bill in principle, we are keen to ensure there are measures that move towards mandatory qualifications for property managers as a minimum, and whilst we understand the Government will want to respond to the consultation exercise and Select Committee, we hope it will declare its intentions soon, so that the sector has some certainty. It is vital that empowered commonholders and leaseholders are supported by competent, qualified professional property managers.
Greater resident empowerment and independence is a worthy ambition but it must not get ahead of protecting those owners from an unregulated sector, managing people’s safety in their homes and millions of pounds in their greatest assets, yet with zero bar to entry. But, with the right safeguards in place, we know it can work. A co-proprietor tenure operates in most other countries around the world, including Scotland. However, with two-thirds of the buildings managed by our members already homeowner-run through resident management companies, it is vital that they have access to professional and competent support.
So, as more homeowners collectively choose their managing agents, there must be stronger regulatory oversight to raise standards. The government must go further than mandating qualifications and introduce regulation of property managers to secure better outcomes for residents and restore confidence in flat ownership.” On the Remediation Bill “The slow pace of fixing unsafe buildings, nearly nine years after the Grenfell Tower fire, has clearly shown the need for legislation. The Remediation Bill is to be welcomed as far as it goes, particularly for residents who have been living with dangerous cladding for years. However, the proposed Bill falls short on two crucial issues: implementing a backstop for pledged developers and addressing internal safety defects.
First, the backstop for inaction applies to landlords, but not to developers – who pledged to fix their buildings more than three years ago but have still only completed 10% of the necessary remediation work, our data shows. This is counterintuitive when developers were responsible for the construction of their buildings and are taking the longest to fix them. We have found that nearly 60% of developer-pledged projects have not yet even agreed the scope of works.”
The Property Institute Service Charge Index 2026 Report Released
The Property Institute (TPI) is pleased to announce the publication of its Service Charge Index 2026 report. Based on contributions from thirteen TPI member firms, the report draws on data from 2,137 residential estates covering more than 117,000 homes, presenting data on residential service charge trends across England, Scotland and Wales.
TPI would like to thank all contributing members for supporting this important sector-wide benchmarking initiative and helping to strengthen the evidence base for the residential management sector.
About the Report
Providing insight into service charge trends between 2024 and 2026, including analysis by building height and age, helping to build a clearer understanding of the factors influencing residential management costs across different types of buildings and developments.
Key Highlights 2024–2026
- Average service charges increased by 5.8% — slightly below cumulative inflation of 6.1% over the same period.
- The largest service charge cost components are repairs and maintenance (20%), reserve funds (16%), and building insurance (13%).